DENVER (AP) — Attorneys for former President Donald Trump argue that an attempt to bar him from the 2024 ballot under a rarely used “insurrection” clause of the Constitution should be dismissed as a violation of his freedom of speech.

The lawyers made the argument in a filing posted Monday by a Colorado court in the most significant of a series of challenges to Trump’s candidacy under the Civil War-era clause in the 14th Amendment. The challenges rest on Trump’s attempts to overturn his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden and his role leading up to the violent Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

  • Gargleblaster
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, I heard this back on reddit. Some Trumpbro was trying to argue that J6 wasn’t an insurrection, that it was a protest.

    Whelp, what shitty luck you planned your protest to coincide with the certifying of the election results, you insurrectionist turnip.

    This is going nowhere.

    • @InverseParallax
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      The civil war was a disagreement about the use of farm equipment.