Dear lemmy, someone very close to my heart is starting to fall into conspiracy theories. It’s heartbreaking. Among other things, he has now told me that soy beans are not supposed to be consumed by human beings and is convinced that despite the literal centuries of human soy bean cultivation and consumption, we shouldn’t eat it or anything derived from it for this reason (ie tofu, soy sauce, etc…evidence that soy is present in other common foods doesn’t seem to register with him).

I don’t even know where he got this information from and can’t find a single source to back it up (even disingenuously). I’ve tried explaining to him that sure, in its original state it’s not edible, but undergoes processing (LIKE MANY OTHER FOODS) to become edible. And that this has gone on since at least the 11th century, so it’s not like Big Soy is trying to poison the little people.

He’s normally a very reasonable and intelligent person, and I don’t know how to reach him. I thought it might be helpful to show him where these myths have come from with hard data sources to prove it. He seems open to the possibility, so I don’t think he’s a lost cause yet!

Help?

  • @escaped_cruzader
    link
    -18 months ago

    This is more complicated, as is often the case

    Impossible, @Heavybell assured my it’s a conspiracy theory peddled by woman-hating alt-right goons

    • @angrystego
      link
      38 months ago

      Come on, people, what’s up with the downvotes? This is a very obvious /s and I appreciate it as a response :)

      • @SgtAStrawberry
        link
        38 months ago

        Sir, we’re on the internet discussing conspiracy theories. About if a extremely common condiments and milk substitution ingredients, can turn you into a woman. There is nothing like a obvious s.

        But I do admit I did also really like the response and it does fall closer to the obvious s than some other ones, but you really can’t be to sure this days.