• @SkybreakerEngineer
      link
      English
      921 year ago

      If you think that running people over is a valid response to a minor inconvenience, you might be a terrorist.

      • blanketswithsmallpox
        link
        fedilink
        -66
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, they’re not. Quit watering down what terrorism means.

        Terrorism is someone who specifically is trying to kill, maim, destroy, or significantly hurt people due to very narrow ideologies which are usually VERY political now.

        Running people over because you can’t get to work isn’t one of them. That is attempted manslaughter if you hurt them bad enough, not a fucking terrorist.

        Either you guys know way more about the incident than I do since you’re close to the police and already know it’s a Trumper who hates strikes and thought they were all gay black democrats, who potentially showed up specifically to hurt these people, or it was some asshole trying to get to work and got so manic he decided it’s better to maim or kill people than to get to work.

        THEY, ARE NOT, THE SAME.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          Lol, what? Terrorism has a very broad definition and for good reason.

          The main way to identify terrorism is if the terrorist’s goal is to instill fear into the populace. That’s why it’s called, terrorism after all. It’s an asymmetrical warfare tactic that people use when fighting directly isn’t viable.

          Sad seeing people live in their fantasy worlds and then get their panties in a bunch when met with reality.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          171 year ago

          How do you know why they were run over when the person who did it hasn’t been caught?

          • blanketswithsmallpox
            link
            fedilink
            -17
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Exactly. Thank you.

            I am fully willing to change my thought on the matter at the drop of a hat with new information. But the way the article reads is VERY different from every terrorist car attack we’ve seen in the USA in previous years.

            The strikers were blocking an exit to the processing center on West Bristol Road, Bade said, when the incident took place.

            The driver, who drove off after the incident, has not been located, Bade said.

            UAW Region 1-D President Steve Dawes told MLive-The Flint Journal that the vehicle involved in the incident was dark in color, possibly an HHR or PT Cruiser.

            He added that two of the five people hit were taken to a local hospital.

            “It was uncalled for,” Dawes said. “These people are out here, you know these are my membership, and they’re out here doing a peaceful, legal demonstration.

            “This is very serious and we’re going to be pushing this issue.”

        • @grue
          link
          English
          161 year ago

          Crossing a picket line is an inherently political act. Terrorism is the use of violence for political ends. Connect the fucking dots.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Terrorism doesn’t have to be political.

            Your goal just needs to be to instill fear in a population.

            • @grue
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              Even if that’s true, it only expands the definition, which doesn’t refute my point.

        • @blazeknave
          link
          121 year ago

          Who are they? Op meant you. They’re referencing your validation of terrorizing striking workers from exercising their constitutional rights. You’re validating it by minimizing its importance.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          and already know it’s a Trumper who hates strikes and thought they were all gay black democrats

          I mean, this is entirely plausible.

          • blanketswithsmallpox
            link
            fedilink
            -13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yep, and yet the article says nothing close to it, and is described the same way every frustrated person dealing with blocked roads does when they panic and flee and eventually get hit with significant battery or accidental manslaughter charges. Unless their car started to get beat on and they tried breaking in, in which case, it ends up being self defense. Isn’t that how the charges against the dude who ran down a bunch of motorcyclicsts got free? He had his whole family with him too though iirc. I think it was this? but I swear it was denser and more in a city.

        • @Facelesscog
          link
          -11 year ago

          Where are you getting your definition? I would like to be able to compare them.

    • @Wodge
      link
      English
      351 year ago

      I get frustrated by average things, like the kids not closing cupboard doors or leaving their stuff everywhere. I have yet to run over anyone due to these average frustrations.

      The person at the UAW picket was not dealing with average frustrations, they were a terrorist.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        -321 year ago

        Terrorist? Really? That word has just lost all meaning huh

        • @Wodge
          link
          English
          121 year ago

          I dunno, the OED definition is: “a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” The Unlawful violence was the act of running people over, they’re car factory workers, so non military, ergo civilians, and they did it to against people expressing their opinion, which could be argued to be political as it regards the politics of CEOs compensation and the growing inequality of the world.

          So yeah, terrorist.

          • Alien Nathan Edward
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            He’s talking about the secret meaning where conservative politics aren’t politics so conservative terrorists can’t be terrorists.

              • Alien Nathan Edward
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Can’t touch grass, too busy breaking down doors and bear spraying cops at my peaceful protest over election integrity concerns. Maybe next week after I’m done trying to kidnap the governor of Michigan, but it might conflict with Yet Another Lone Wolf Mass Shooting so I can’t commit to anything.

                After all, like conservatives loudly and proudly said at CPAC, “We are all domestic terrorists.”

          • XbSuper
            link
            English
            -111 year ago

            Jesus Christ. I often wonder why I’m still on Lemmy when I hear nonsense like this.

            • @Hoomod
              link
              101 year ago

              It’s not an airport, you don’t need to announce your departure

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              01 year ago

              They’re just kids. Kids are stupid sometimes.

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            -131 year ago

            Lol don’t hurt yourself with that stretch

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            -21 year ago

            Which is not even close to “one driver was incredibly frustrated at the people blocking him from going home”