• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    You’re forgetting that it’s not like we go to Rowling’s house to get her books, or even download the manuscript P2P from her personal server.

    Someone’s exploited labor printed the folio, bound it, packed it, shipped it, stocked it, advertised it, sold it to you and put it into a bag…

    And more, cut down the trees to make the paper, mixed the ink, delivered the reams and the vats to the factory…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I have done things that are hard work for less compensation than it deserves and been happy to give it freely (ie charity, volunteering), but that doesn’t mean we can’t examine the power structure, even if the plurality of people are happy inside it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But it’s not the author exploiting publishing companies. It’s the execs of those companies exploiting their own workers. The publishing companies make excellent money (and same for paper creators, etc). Just it disproportionately goes to execs and possibly shareholders, not workers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        of course you can slice it any way you like. I’m not saying no one should be an author, but I am saying billionaires aren’t made without exploitation somewhere