Gamma@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoRaspberry Pi - Introducing: Raspberry Pi 5www.raspberrypi.comexternal-linkmessage-square261linkfedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]selfhosted[email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1external-linkRaspberry Pi - Introducing: Raspberry Pi 5www.raspberrypi.comGamma@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square261linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]selfhosted[email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareGustavoMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoShould have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ““forever”” and is ideal for servers.
minus-squareKushanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoBut that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don’t necessarily need it. Don’t get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I’d have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.
minus-squareMountainTurkey@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that’s why they opted for a HAT
Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ““forever”” and is ideal for servers.
But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don’t necessarily need it.
Don’t get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I’d have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.
You got a power button too /s
deleted by creator
I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that’s why they opted for a HAT