• eric
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I agree that that is how it was intended, so in turn, the amendment provides for National guardsmen and state militias to be permitted to keep guns rather than all private citizens.

    • @JustAManOnAToiletOP
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It says the right of the people, not right of the militia.

      • eric
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What people? If you don’t think it’s referring to the people in a militia, you are completely ignoring the first part of the sentence. From congress.gov:

        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

        It doesn’t say all people. Considering the entire sentence, “people” implies nothing more than the people of a well regulated militia.

        Also, Madison was very clear that the right to bear arms was for the militia in the federalist papers.

        • @JustAManOnAToiletOP
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It seems you have your mind made up, but you’re incorrect. The punctuation does a lot of work there separating the prefatory clause. The people are the same people covered in the first amendment.