It seems every couple of years it’s in danger to shut down. Is this a genuine thing, a political play or something else?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    The video in the other comment is great, but doesn’t really get into how useless this “tool” is for everyone. We never had a shutdown before the 80s, and they have turned into annual talking points. Each shutdown the rules are a bit different depending on length and if partial budgets get passed. Defense sometimes gets its own budget passed so they don’t shutdown.

    In a shutdown, federal employees don’t work. It may sound like this will save the government money because people won’t get paid for their non work. This isn’t true, a vast majority of government employees continue to get paid, so the government is spending money it doesn’t have and no work is getting done. Government contractors don’t make new money during a shutdown. Large government contractors anticipate this and will plan a 14 day shutdown into their budget so they can keep working. This means they just have to over bill the government the rest of the year. Smaller contractors are the ones who actually get screwed out of pay and work, and usually subcontractors of contractors as well.

    If it sounds like this doesn’t help anyone, you’d be right. It’s a bit of political theater that was more or less invented in the 80s so that congress can make the sitting president (probably from the opposing party) look bad. Government spending is never more inefficient than during a shutdown, so if you actually cared about spending, you would avoid them no matter what.

    • IllecorsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This sounds horrible. What would the mechanism to dismantle this be?

      • Dudewitbow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        People voting for people looking to actually get shit done or collectivelly weaken their power(which the latter wont happen)

        • IllecorsOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          How big of a part of population would one need to actually achieve anything?

          • Dudewitbow
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            People need to vote in half to get shit done, 2/3 if vetos are used, and 3/4 if it meant amendment levels