• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Just do NSFW and PORN.
    Porn is the reason for wanting a distinction, so don’t beat around the bush.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      551 year ago

      A gore or nsfl tag is much more important than a porn one. The disturbing shit that will haunt my nightmares is what I want to keep off my feed, I’m not particularly worried about accidentally seeing some genitals.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      501 year ago

      No, the NSFL tag is more important imo. I don’t mind seeing tits randomly, I do not wanna see gore ever, period.

      • @cm0002
        link
        -21 year ago

        Even NSFL could be ideally split into NSFL and ENSFL (Extremely Not Safe for Life)

        I don’t mind seeing like an X-RAY of somebody who broke their arm in 4 places, but a photo of it IRL and blood everywhere is ENSFL

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          But I don’t think an X-RAY would even qualify as NSFL, would it? I mean you see that factually, that probably hurts, but you get zero impression of it.
          Kinda like fotos of the atomic bomb explosions from WW2. You know some people are suffering in the very moment that foto was taken, but you can’t see it, so it’s not NSFL.
          Or do you have a dofferent oppinion?

    • @Thrillhouse
      link
      381 year ago

      I think gore as well. Things can be nsfw but also not gore.

      • kib48
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        at that point it’d probably be better to just have a CW system like Mastodon

        • XbSuper
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          People keep saying this, but it wouldn’t allow for simple filtering, as there would be far too many unknowns.