As Nebraska’s new law restricting gender-affirming care for minors goes into effect this weekend, families with transgender children and the doctors who treat them are steeling themselves for change. But exactly what and how much change is anyone’s guess.
A key aspect of the law is a set of treatment guidelines that has yet to be created. Affected families, doctors and even lawmakers say they have largely gotten no response from health officials on when they can expect the new rules, which should lay out how and when transgender minors can be treated with puberty blockers and hormones.
Many of them fear Republican officials and their appointees in charge of administering the rules are slow-walking the regulations as a way to block treatment for new transgender patients under 19, the age of adulthood under Nebraska law.
So you would repeal laws that prevent 12 year Olds from getting tattoos?
Like the other guy said. If a doctor said my child was far more likely to commit suicide without a tattoo, and they could live their fullest and truest lives as themselves tatted up, you bet your ass I’d take that kid to get a tattoo.
Am I the villain here?
I’m just going off your first sentence: “Legislating how people use their bodies is wholly wrong.”
Now you’re talking about medical conditions, which means it’s not wholly wrong, it’s conditionally wrong.
Apologies for being ambiguous in the first sentence. You can read the subsequent ones for clarity on my position.
If there is a valid medical reason for it, yes.