LEESBURG, Va. — After two days of testimony, the man who shot a 21-year-old YouTuber inside Dulles Town Center on video in April has been found not guilty on two charges of malicious wounding.

The jury found Alan Colie not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding or use of a firearm for aggravated malicious wounding, however, he was found guilty of firing a gun inside the mall. That guilty verdict has been set aside until a hearing to discuss it on October 19.

Colie, a DoorDash driver, was on trial for shooting Tanner Cook, the man behind the YouTube channel “Classified Goons,” at the Dulles Town Center back in April. Colie admitted to shooting Cook when he took the stand Wednesday but claimed it was self-defense.

The case went viral not because there was a shooting inside a mall, but because Cook is known to make prank videos. Cook amassed 55,000 subscribers with an average income of up to $3,000 per month. He said he elicits responses to entertain viewers and called his pranks “comedy content.”

Colie faced three charges, including aggravated malicious wounding, malicious discharge of a firearm within an occupied dwelling, and use of firearm for aggravated malicious wounding. The jury had to weigh different factors including if Colie had malicious intent and had reasonable fear of imminent danger of bodily harm.

Cook was in the courtroom when jurors were shown footage of him getting shot near the stomach – a video that has not yet been made public. Cook’s mother, however, left the courtroom to avoid watching the key piece of evidence in her son’s shooting.

The footage was recorded by one of Cook’s friends, who was helping to record a prank video for Cook’s channel. The video shows Cook holding his phone near Colie’s ear and using Google Translate to play a phrase out loud four times, while Colie backed away.

When he testified, Colie recalled how Cook and his friend approached him from behind and put the phone about 6 inches away from his face. He described feeling confused by the phrase Cook was playing. Colie told the jury the two looked “really cold and angry.” He also acknowledged carrying a gun during work as a way to protect himself after seeing reports of other delivery service drivers being robbed.

“Colie walked into the mall to do his job with no intention of interacting with Tanner Cook. None,” Adam Pouilliard, Colie’s defense attorney, said. "He’s sitting next to his defense attorneys right now. How’s that for a consequence?”

The Commonwealth argued that Cook was never armed, never placed hands on Colie and never posed a threat. They stressed that just because Cook may not seem like a saint or his occupation makes him appear undesirable, that a conviction is warranted.

“We don’t like our personal space invaded, but that does not justify the ability to shoot someone in a public space during an interaction that lasted for only 20 seconds,” Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Eden Holmes said.

The jury began deliberating around 11:30 a.m. Thursday. Shortly after 3:30 p.m., the jury came back saying they were divided and couldn’t come to a resolution. The judge instructed them to continue deliberating and later returned with the not-guilty verdict.

WUSA9 caught up with the Cook family following the verdict. When we asked Tanner Cook how he felt about the outcome, he said it is all up to God.

“I really don’t care, I mean it is what it is,” he said. “It’s God’s plan at the end of the day.”

His mother, Marla Elam, said the family respects the jury and that the Cook family is just thankful Tanner is alive.

“Nothing else matters right now,” she said.

Here’s the video by NBC Washington, apologies that it’s served by Discord

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    -121 year ago

    Again, do you shoot people expecting them to be fine?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, killing someone is often a successful way to remove the perceived threat to your life.

          But, you keep conveniently forgetting that no one was killed.

          • blazera
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            Usually, and very regularly, people are killed by being shot. Sometimes they survive. That doesnt change the fact they intended to kill someone.

              • blazera
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                You shouldnt shoot people because it typically kills them

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  You should if you believe your life is in danger. I’m not sure why this is such a hard concept for you to grasp.

                  • blazera
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -21 year ago

                    The part where there was no danger or even threat.

      • @Touching_Grass
        link
        -91 year ago

        a threat like a cell phone and a friend watching

        • gregorum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          If that person is using the cell phone to assault you and threaten your life, which is the case in this instance, then, yes, they would be legally justified in doing so.

          • @Touching_Grass
            link
            -71 year ago

            Lol no its the case here. The mental gymnastic used to justify shooting people in America is fucking bizarre

            • gregorum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              The only mental gymnastics present here are in your repeated twisting of and denial of the facts. Whether you like them or not is irrelevant.

              • @Touching_Grass
                link
                -21 year ago

                Says the person saying playing audio on your phone is a life threatening situation

              • @Touching_Grass
                link
                -21 year ago

                Says the person saying playing audio on your phone is a life threatening situation

                • gregorum
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  I never said that.

                  You sure do like making up stories.

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Again, nobody was murdered in this case. The facts of the case are what matter, not your hypothetical musings.

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        -81 year ago

        in the cases where people are killed you’re gonna be conveniently absent from discussion. And believe me, there will be many, many more cases of people being killed thanks to people like you.

        • gregorum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Since you feel so comfortable predicting the future, why weren’t you there to tell this YouTuber that assaulting this man would get him shot?

          Or maybe you just prefer to deflect attention from the fact that you peddle is disinformation and bad-faith arguments in order to push and agenda. Either way, considering the facts in the case, what we have is a person legally justified in defending themselves from assault, whether you like it or not. No amount of your hypotheticals, attempts at prognostication, or casting aspersions while refusing to accept the truth will ever change those facts.

        • ramOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          I look forward to seeing more level headed discussion from the beacon of truth you must be to be so confident that you’re correct yet so incapable of adequately describing why to a convincing degree.

          • blazera
            link
            fedilink
            -51 year ago

            Confident that…more people are going to be shot to death in the future???

            How disjointed from reality are you people?

            • gregorum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              That can be avoided by not provoking people into self-defense by assaulting them, as is what happened in this case.

              • blazera
                link
                fedilink
                -31 year ago

                Boy youre gonna run the absolute loosest definition of the word assault into the ground, you just want to see more people killed

                • gregorum
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  5
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Once again, nobody died here, and I’m not the one with difficulty understanding the definition of the word “assault”.