• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1741 year ago

    Show me a MAGA politician, and I’ll show you a person bought and sold by Russian interference.

    • @j4k3
      link
      English
      681 year ago

      And I will show you how the second and third world wars started by a dictator doing a land grab and fucktard leaders doing nothing when they had a chance. If Ukraine does not win, WW3 is the inevitable outcome in the next 10 years. These are the people that cause the deaths of millions.

      • @Dagnet
        link
        English
        281 year ago

        Most of them won’t be around in 10 years, so they don’t care

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        If only you thought the same about Turkey&Azerbaijan.

        No, whoever wins, it’ll just show that brute force matters and everything else doesn’t, be it for the Russian leadership or for that of any Western country.

        WWIII is already inevitable, in one way or another. And fuck everyone talking about realpolitik, because realpolitik is what got us here.

        Other than that, Ukraine is going to win or make the conflict frozen against Russia, with or without more support. Russia is not going to be a participant in that WWIII, not a major one anyway.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        -111 year ago

        World War 3 is always the inevitable outcome in the next 10 years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -89
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can read the polls and can see that a plurality of voters seem to be against more aid.

      Edit: -72 is breddy good, I’m quite impressed at how fact resistant you guys are. It really IS the reddit experience.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        501 year ago

        a plurality

        Yeah, about ten guys who were bought and sold by Russia and a couple thousand other folks that fell for their con. By no means a majority and also by no means a reasonable stance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            These polls are as idiotic as the Brexit Referendum was.

            People have no fucking clue what’s going on and they answer by their “gut feeling”. So it’s all down to the way the question is formed.

            And it’s not a “yes” or “no” type of situation either.

            • Saik0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              So your argument is what exactly? That the poll is flawed… so there isn’t a majority or plurality? You realize that both for and against could have been answering by their “gut feeling”… a 50/50 split kind of proves the point that it’s not just a few thousand like was claimed.

              Of course if you have a better source showing that Americans are happy with spending more money in Ukraine that’s of higher quality I’m all ears.

              • @jarfil
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                A 50/50 split also kind of proves that the answers are as thought out as a coin toss…

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  So all 50/50 splits are coin toss decisions and not devisive topics? That’s a hot take. Especially with n=1000+ polls.

                  • @jarfil
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Polls with a 50/50 split, are a poll structural fail. It means the questions are too ambiguous, and the poll didn’t control for it. A split of 40/40 with 20% “undecided”? That would be a credible divisive poll. A 50/50? No way.

                    From the source you cited: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23897329-cnn-ukraine-poll

                    Look at the “trends” section on page 3, “not sure” between 7% and 14%, those are credible numbers. Now look at pages 10&11, 0% to 1% “no opinion”? That’s BS.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                My argument is that linking a shitty poll that paint the issue in black or white does nothing to help to paint the picture of public opinion on the russia’s attack on Ukraine and how people feel about it.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -21 year ago

                  Can you show how the poll is misrepresenting it as a black/white issue?

                  Do you have ANY better statistical resource?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Can you show how the poll is misrepresenting it as a black/white issue? I can, but you don’t seem to be genuinely interested, so I’m not going to waste my time.

                    Do you have ANY better statistical resource? No, but sometimes no resource is of more quality than a misleading poll.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -151 year ago

          “someone said something I don’t understand, they must be pro-Russian”

          Flawless logic, kiddo.

          is CNN also a Russian shill?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -71 year ago

              Stating an obvious reason that democratically elected officials might have an opinion is pro-Russian.

              I guess that elections are also undemocratic?

              You’re a loon and I thank you for helping me grow my Blocklist.

              • @alienanimals
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                This Putin bootlicker is too stupid to realize he’s helping America’s long-term enemy. He thinks he’s an American patriot, but he’s actually just a Russian simp.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        To my knowledge IDU policies are in support of Ukraine.

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            That’s true, but they have just invited (former Ukrainian pro-EU president) Poroshenko to their honorary advisory board. I do not think this is pro-Russia stand.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -111 year ago

              The IDU doesn’t care about Ukraine except insofar as it is a pawn to push right-wing ideology abroad.

              • MxM111
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                I agree that their focus is center-right ideology, not war in Ukraine. But they do not support Russia, and those rare statements that they do (and the actions like inviting Poroshenko) shows that in this question they are on Ukraine side. There is more “politicking” than just Russo-Ukranian war. Walmart also is not focused on Russo-Ukranian war, does it make it pro-Russia and converting MAGA politicians to pro-Russia stand?