• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, the Lebanese source “Tim Anderson”.

    the European Parliament went so far as to blame both the USSR under Joseph Stalin, alongside Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, as being jointly responsible for WW2

    Uh…. Then he delivers a diatribe on how Stalin’s self-made famine was actually fantastic. Yes, we’ve heard all about that on Lemmy recently, thanks.

    Yes, very nuanced and well reasoned “Marxist” perspective. Capitalist alliance having members in Eastern Europe: omg, so evil. Capitalist Russia controlling Eastern Europe: great, for some unexplained reason.

    • @TokenBoomer
      link
      -71 year ago

      Capitalist NATO controlling Eastern Europe: great, for some unexplained reason.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, great point, so clearly Russia should ‘liberate’ them with tanks and missiles. NATO exists precisely to stop Russia from doing to member states what they are doing in Ukraine. Countries in E. Europe were not coerced or forced into joining NATO or the EU. Nobody has any interest in invading Russia, because it would be futile and entirely useless.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          -21 year ago

          NATO exists precisely to stop Russia from doing to member states what they are doing in Ukraine.

          Wrong. Check your NATO history.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why don’t you tell me what you think it is instead of “wrong”?

            I didn’t say “NATO was started to…” yes, it was founded to stop the Soviets from expanding and as a pact of mutual defense. Same thing. Obviously the USSR doesn’t exist now so that wouldn’t continue to be a goal.

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              01 year ago

              NATO should have dissolved as an organization after it’s goal of thwarting communism from the Soviet Union was met. Because it’s real goal is capitalist hegemony it continues.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I don’t see why they would do that. it’s basically just an alliance of the US and EU. Are they capitalists? Sure, so what. I don’t see that changing any time soon. At the same time, the usefulness of a mutual defense between the two continues. Russia’s demonstrating that right now. If not for NATO, who else would they be invading soon? Belarus? Poland? Estonia? Why would NATO choose to dissolve and allow that?

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  Are they capitalists? Sure, so what.

                  Well, there’s your problem!

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    What’s the alternative you’re suggesting? What major countries who rival NATO are not capitalist? They should cancel NATO and let smaller countries be taken over by capitalist Russia because the EU is capitalist? “NATO member countries should change their economic system” isn’t the same as “NATO shouldn’t exist”.