@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoDaily Thread: Wednesday rhymes with… (21 June 2023)message-square467fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down10
arrow-up116arrow-down1message-squareDaily Thread: Wednesday rhymes with… (21 June 2023)@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square467fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoWealthy paying to die in ways reserved for workers as a result of an employees negligence.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoI would imagine that being wealthy, one would go above and beyond to ensure one’s safety. Especially when it’s a highly dangerous situation.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-21 year agoDefinitely would rather be in an Airbus though. With triple redundancies on all steering and control related systems, and almost all software will be mathematically proven for correctness. All this is hard and expensive though (Software in this environment cannot use dynamic memory at all), hence I can see a startup taking shortcuts.
Wealthy paying to die in ways reserved for workers as a result of an employees negligence.
I would imagine that being wealthy, one would go above and beyond to ensure one’s safety. Especially when it’s a highly dangerous situation.
deleted by creator
Definitely would rather be in an Airbus though.
With triple redundancies on all steering and control related systems, and almost all software will be mathematically proven for correctness.
All this is hard and expensive though (Software in this environment cannot use dynamic memory at all), hence I can see a startup taking shortcuts.