• ZagorathOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    That’s the car brain talking. It’s not a cogent explanation.

    Why, when cyclists factually do not cause anywhere near the same level of harm as drivers, should the fine be the same?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It’s nothing to do with that. It’s about lack of consequences. A $10 fine is no deterrent at all for obeying the law. For any road user.

      • ZagorathOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s well-known that severity of punishment has very little bearing on deterrent effectiveness. What works is likelihood of facing that punishment at all.

        But again, enforcing speed limits on bikes just makes no sense. It’s responding to a risk that basically doesn’t exist, and any resources that could be spent on it would be far better spent ensuring drivers don’t break the law.

        Of course, that would require cops doing the right thing in the interest of actual safety. But the truth is, cops don’t give a fuck about that. They’re as car-brained as our politicians, if not more so. They’ll spend heaps of resources enforcing these nonsense speed limits, while they refuse to enforce laws like the minimum passing distance for cyclists even when they’re literally handed the evidence needed.