@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agotar.gzfeddit.deimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down13
arrow-up1397arrow-down1imagetar.gzfeddit.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@Zardozlink4•1 year agoIt’s likely a combination of tradition/habit and compatibility. Tar.gz is widely supported on *nix systems, and while 7z is highly efficient, its not as widely supported and may need additional libraries or software to work on some systems,/distros
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoCompatibility. Every Linux system comes with tar and gzip
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoAlso, 7z does not store file permissions. Doesn’t matter for a bunch of text/media files, but needed for distributing software.
Why use this over .7z? I’m legit curious.
deleted by creator
It’s likely a combination of tradition/habit and compatibility. Tar.gz is widely supported on *nix systems, and while 7z is highly efficient, its not as widely supported and may need additional libraries or software to work on some systems,/distros
Compatibility. Every Linux system comes with tar and gzip
Also, 7z does not store file permissions. Doesn’t matter for a bunch of text/media files, but needed for distributing software.
Why use this over .xz? I’m legit curious.