if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because…

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
  • @folkrav
    link
    4
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      118 months ago

      People are able to on some songs because mp3 is poorly optimized for certain sounds, especially cymbals. However, opus can achieve better quality than that at 128k with fewer outliers than mp3 at 320k, which saves a lot of space.

      • @folkrav
        link
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      88 months ago

      We’re not talking lossless. The comment above specified Opus-encoded OGG, which is lossy.

      For example, I converted my music library from MP3 to OGG Opus and the size shrank from 16 GB to just 3 GB.

      And if converting from lossless to both MP3 and OGG Opus, then OGG does sound quite a bit better at smaller file sizes.

      So, the argument here is that musicians are underselling their art by primarily offering MP3 downloads. If the whole industry would just magically switch to OGG Opus, that would be quite an improvement for everyone involved.

      • @folkrav
        link
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Well, I understood this post to mean, if you had a wish, what would you wish for? Not necessarily that it’s realistic…

          I do agree with your points. Although, I can’t help but feel like more people would prefer local files, if those actually sounded better than the bandwidth-limited streaming services.

          • @folkrav
            link
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think that people overstate MP3’s losses, and I agree at 320k that it’s inaudible, but I can or at least have been able to tell at 128k, mostly with cymbals. Granted, cymbals aren’t that common, but it’s nice to not have them sound muddy. And, honestly, there just isn’t a lot of reason to use MP3 for anything compressed today, other than maybe hardware decoding on very small devices and widespread support. There are open standards that are better.

      • @folkrav
        link
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator