@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoreverse Indydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imagereverse Indydiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareHot SaucermanlinkfedilinkEnglish59•edit-21 year agoI think you’re missing their point. Indy was always “it belongs in a museum” when its an intricate part of some foreign nations history. That museum always seemed to be British or US. The point being they’re just stealing their history back. A reverse Indy. “It belongs to the culture it came from. Allow them to choose what to do with it. Perhaps they even have their own museums.”
I think you’re missing their point.
Indy was always “it belongs in a museum” when its an intricate part of some foreign nations history. That museum always seemed to be British or US.
The point being they’re just stealing their history back. A reverse Indy.
“It belongs to the culture it came from. Allow them to choose what to do with it. Perhaps they even have their own museums.”
Very well put.