• @Eatspancakes84
        link
        81 year ago

        China/Russia/Europe are largely inhabited by people whose ancestry traces back 1000s of years to the same region. That’s very different from North America, where most natives where killed (either through disease or “policy”).

        That’s not to excuse their past behaviour (Europeans started the genocide in North America), but it’s still very different.

        • @kemsat
          link
          71 year ago

          Yup. That’s the biggest difference. My ancestors trace back to Beringia (what is now the Bering Strait) but my national leader is an 80 year old European American.

        • Tb0n3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Except for the Han Chinese with the Uyghurs and the Tibetans and the Mongolians.

          I suppose you could even add their own people for the Chinese and the Russians when they were starved during the communist times.

    • @tugash
      link
      181 year ago

      How’s the genocide of a whole continent “average history”? The magnitude of destruction in the Americas is not common and this downplay of a continent-wide genocide is annoying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 year ago

        Because there are other examples of continent wide genocide.

        Humans are the fucking worst and it isn’t unique to one area

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          because there are other examples

          …ok? I guess I don’t get why there needs to be any comparison, since it inevitably ends up sounding like “oh, well this one wasn’t as bad as that one. Happens all the time.”

        • CyclohexaneM
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Other examples existing does not change that it is historically unprecedented and far from the norm. And its just a really strange and pointless thing to point.

          Person A: “my dad died in a car bomb” Person B: “ehh, average family death” A: “uhh what?” B: "well, there are other examples of people dying in car bombs, dude! "

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            The root comment was “average history”. I replied to someone suggesting it wasnt, and disagreed with them.

            To use your analogy,

            "My dad died of old age.

            What? That’s insane no one dies of that.

            No, it’s pretty normal"

            • CyclohexaneM
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              You’re correcting me saying that expelling native populations time and time again from every land they go to, then genociding their entire population to the point of near extinction, using the most horrific methods and over centuries, is more akin to dying of old age than dying by a bomb?

              Please read that again and confirm to me that’s what you’re saying, because it sounds absolutely ridiculous. This scale and this horror are not common historical occurrence.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                That’s correct, humans have used the cutting edge methods to drive out and destroy native populations in the name of expansion, for thousands of years.

                I’m not celebrating it.

                • CyclohexaneM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I am sorry to restate this again, but the expulsion, genocide on the scale (both in size and horror) is historically unprecedented. You’re going to have to prove this to me if you think it’s a common occurrence instead of continuing to repeat it.

                  And for the record, no one here is talking about small scale expulsion. I am talking about expulsion AND genocide on the same scale and horror committed here. Show me that it is a common occurrence and I will concede.

      • @Malek061
        link
        71 year ago

        The Mongols genocided two continents and a sub continent.

        • @PyroNeurosis
          link
          31 year ago

          Did they? I was under the impression they came in, did a conquer, and basically left with the conquered understanding that the horde’d be back for their tribute.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            Yeah they obliterated smaller outside towns to scare the bigger cities into giving them shit. They killed a lot but I’m not sure it counts as genocide since the eradication of people wasn’t the point.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tell that to the something like 50 million people they killed while doing so.

              You have to be deeply ignorant, or some kind of idiot, to give the Mongols a pass while condemning western Europeans.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                I’m not giving anyone a “pass” to genocide, only attempting to be very clear about what the precise definition of it is.

                Everyone killing people for their stuff sucks, but humans were doing that shit forever.

                Not every generation was loading specific people into trains and camps just to gather them for removal from the genetic code.

      • @Ducks
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

      • TheDankHold
        link
        fedilink
        -71 year ago

        Because you’re lumping in the unavoidable disease transfer of first contact with intentional conquest and violence. Take away that, which was going to happen whenever any Afro-Eurasian community first interacted with people from the americas, and you get a very comparable situation to many things throughout history.

        • @tugash
          link
          231 year ago

          The genocide didn’t happen solely after the first contact, the massacre of natives lasted centuries. Many nations were wiped out in the XIX century.

          And a quote for you

          Proponents of the default position emphasize attrition by disease despite other causes equally deadly, if not more so. In doing so they refuse to accept that the colonization of America was genocidal by plan, not simply the tragic fate of populations lacking immunity to disease.

          Professor Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz

          • TheDankHold
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I never said it was the only thing so I wouldn’t disagree with you on that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s strong evidence the disease was on purpos- Ah who am I fucking kidding, the colonizers flat out admitted it.