Madison County Public Library administrators were asked to go over a list of potentially “sexually explicit” books to be moved from the children’s and young adult section to the adult section. The majority of these books were about the LGBTQ community. At least one was added to the list because the author’s last name is Gay.

  • @cricket97
    link
    -201 year ago

    Fyi since I’m assuming you didn’t read the article, the book was just moved out of the Children’s section. Obviously a mistake in instance, but it’s not being banned. Mein Kampf is not in the children’s section. I think it’s fine for sexually explicit books (i.e. the book “Gender queer”) to be moved out of the children’s section

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      “See, it’s not really censorship because…” is an argument anyone should be ashamed to make. Conservatives never have a problem with Mein Kampf in any context.

      • @cricket97
        link
        -91 year ago

        Mein Kampf is not in the children’s section, which is what this article is about. The comparison is useless in this circumstance. Read the article before commenting.

        • Gumby
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          So then are you suggesting that it’s totally ok to remove a book from the children’s section because the author’s last name is “Gay”? Because that’s what this entire post is about.

          • @cricket97
            link
            -81 year ago

            I’m saying the process of removing books from the children’s section is an appropriate policy, even if it was misapplied in this case. It’s not banning books, like many people in here seem to believe.

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              71 year ago

              Hiding children’s books from children at the behest of bigots kinda defeats the purpose of having children’s books. It’s effectively a ban, which is why you’re defending it.

              • @cricket97
                link
                -51 year ago

                I’m ok with removing sexually explicit books from children’s sections yes. Especially ones that show gratuitous sexual activity, such as the book Gender Queer https://data.ibtimes.sg/en/full/52824/gender-queer.jpg?w=813

                Or “This Book is Gay” which gives a step by step on how to use gay hookup apps. These are the books that people are demanding remain in front of children.

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  61 year ago

                  So you support book bans and want to call them something else.

                  • @cricket97
                    link
                    -41 year ago

                    It’s not banning them, just removing them from the Children’s section. Children’s media has always be moderated

                • TheRealKuni
                  link
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Gender Queer was never intended for children. It is aimed at adults and young adults.

                  The NEA recommended it on a list of books for educators and some people misinterpreted this (perhaps purposely, since it acts as really nice fuel for the fear fire) as being recommended for children.

                  It is not, nor was it ever, a children’s book. And should not be in a children’s section. At the youngest, it could be in the YA section (depending on a local library’s discretion).