I’m vaguely interested in having a few different encrypted folders on my computer, with different passwords on each. I don’t have any particular strong requirements. It’s more of a velleity; mostly just to try it so that I know more about it.

That said, when I search for encryption options, I see a lot of different advice from different times. I’m seeings stuff about EncFS, eCryptFS, CryFS; and others… and I find it a bit confusing because to me all those names look basically the same; and it’s not easy for me to tell whether or not the info I’m reading is out of date.

So figure I’d just ask here for recommendations. The way I imagine it, I want some encrypted data on my computer with as little indication of what it is as possible; and but with a command and a password I can then access it like a normal drive or folder; copying stuff in or out, or editing things. And when I’m done, I unmount it (or whatever) and now its inaccessible and opaque again.

I’m under the impression that there are a bunch of different tools that will do what I’ve got in mind. But I’m interested in recommendations (since most of the recommendations I’ve seen on the internet seem to be from years ago, and for maybe slightly different use-cases).

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m not sure what you mean by ‘good luck’ here. Perhaps you got some really cool random encryption blocks or something? In any case, I hadn’t heard of that one yet. So thanks for mentioning it.

      Their approach with separate key-files is probably a wise idea for serious security… but I don’t think I’m that serious right now.

      The puns in the commands feel like they are a style from the past. I don’t think people would do that in serious software made today. I guess this one has been around for awhile!

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mostly just meant that it was easy to use and never lost or ate any of my data.

        I switched over to cryptomator because it lines up better with my use case, but I’ve heard rumors of it losing data, so I’m keeping a close eye on it for now.