• Flying Squid
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    How is that an idea of what the cause of suicide is? Where is the explanation of cause there? Because I gave an explanation of the cause. So far, all you’ve done is play coy.

    • Lols [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      you didnt give an explanation of the cause, you seemingly pulled something out your ass and didnt like when i didnt immediately accept it as fact

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        You think the widespread mistreatment of autistic people is something I invented? Really?

        • Lols [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          im going to assume the complete misinterpretation is genuine and not just strawmanning

          no, i think that the high suicide rates being exclusively due to mistreatment is something you pulled out your ass, especially since the response to ‘do you have proof’ was not ‘yes, here you go’

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said anything about it being exclusively due to mistreatment. That is something you made up.

            And I admitted I didn’t have evidence, so I have no idea why you’re complaining about me not having evidence.

            • Lols [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, but that’s not due to autism, that’s due to the way society treats autistic people

              must be me, but i read that as pretty explicit and unambiguously exclusive language

              And I admitted I didn’t have evidence, so I have no idea why you’re complaining about me not having evidence.

              because i think going ‘well thats wrong, heres whats actually happening’ with 0 evidence is actually a pretty weird thing to do, as is maintaining that it just has to be true when challenged

              • Flying Squid
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Yes, it must be you. If I had meant it to be exclusive, I would have said “that is not solely due to autism, that is solely due to the way society treats autistic people”

                But please, continue to berate me for not having the evidence I admit I don’t have. I’m sure that will lead to productive discussion.

                • Lols [they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  i doubt there was any chance of a productive discussion past ‘well thats wrong, heres whats actually happening’ with 0 evidence and maintaining that it just has to be true when challenged

                  im doing this so folks reading this thread at least get the added context of the above being a complete unsourced guess

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Yep, there it is.

                    “I have no evidence.”

                    “You idiot! You have no evidence!”

                    “I know. I said I have no evidence.”

                    “What kind of fool says that sort of thing without evidence?”

                    “Me, I guess.”

                    “Ha! I knew you had no evidence!”

                    Is this going to continue ad nauseam or do you have a point besides the fact that I said something I don’t have evidence for? Because I think the folks reading this thread might have glommed on to the fact that I have no evidence at this point.