• @CaptPretentious
    link
    English
    -71 year ago

    Well, that’s your choice to side with her on that. A lot of people are interpreting it as 1) a terrible time to try to be funny and 2) can easily be interpreted as support for Hamas, until she got a ton of backlash and it started to cost her money and then she ‘totes didn’t mean it that way, just a prank, for realz!’

      • @SoleInvictus
        link
        English
        -7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That was her mistake - the comment was too vague, so the media jumped on it, skewed the narrative, took that skewed narrative and grossly exaggerated it further, and denounced her as pro-Hamas. It’s obvious to see with even a little bit of reading and it’s both frightening and disgusting.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Uhh, no. It was not her mistake that biased media outlets with an agenda say she said something while not actually reporting the exact thing she said.

          It’s bad journalism, but I don’t think anyone expects reputable journalists to take this matter seriously.

          • @SoleInvictus
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Yeah, I see your point and I agree.

        • @jj4211
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          No, that one comment was not vague, the only active “fighters” to be called “freedom fighters” were Hamas.

          There is no ambiguity, no vagueness.

          • @Aleric
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Lol, this is such horse shit.

          • @SoleInvictus
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            There is absolutely ambiguity, it just doesn’t suit your worldview (or similar) so you lie. It’s your right to lie, but just know that anyone who isn’t dogmatic knows you’re lying.