• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    In his response on X, Mr Musk said: "Our policy is that everything is open and transparent, an approach that I know the EU supports. “Please list the violations you allude to on X, so that the public can see them.”

    So we can pretty much infer what is happening here. They told Musk to take down violating posts. Musk wants them to list the posts publicly so he can have another far-right shitshow where he makes the fucking conflict about him and can pretend to debate. The law does not specify that they need to make the complaint by using the service. They make the complaint by officially filing a complaint. This is not The Elon Show. The timer starts ticking when the complaint is filed. Elon is indicating that he does not intend to comply. Let the chips fall where they may, but I hope this is one of the EU regulations that proportional to the company, not one that costs less than Elon flying his private plane from Austin to Dallas.

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

        • BrikoXOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Twitter was dedicated as a gatekeeper under DSA, so the fine is substantial.

          Edit: I mentioned DMA, but meant DSA. The fine is up to 6% instead of up to 10%.

          • @MutilationWave
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            6% of 0 is $zero or am I misunderstanding worldwide turnover here?

            • BrikoXOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 year ago

              It’s total revenue, not gross profit.