I guess not strictly news - but with all of the vitriol I have seen in discussions on the Israel situation, that have boiled down to arguments over wording, I feel that this take from the BBC is worthy of some discussion.

Mods, feel free to remove if this is not newsy enough.

  • @Mchugho
    link
    English
    -4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Manchester was a terror attack.

      Under international law the Palestinians have a right to resist the occupation. That their tactics are not always in accordance with international law is a point you can make only if you recognise that Israel violates these laws far more frequently, and far more brutally, causing far more deaths and an indescribable amount of misery for millions, every day.

      The BBC will never describe Israel as a terrorist state and so they are quite correct not to label Palestinian resistance as terrorism.

      • @Mchugho
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think one key difference is that Israel has compulsory service for everyone. Like if in the 1770s the Torrey soldiers on leave held a music festival and they all got gunned down, I’m fairly certain the history books would not change substantially. It’s abhorrent, but if you were in the same situation - occupation by some analogous group to wherever you live who have overwhelming military superiority - would you give up your Identity and assimilate, or try to make them hurt? I’m absolutely NOT saying Palestinians are the good guys, I’m just saying I understand where they’re coming from.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It could be an interesting thing to go through various incidents and look, it might boil down to if the parties involved both hold territory?