• hydro033
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    It’s not that easy. There is constant information coming in all the time and intelligent agents need to parse signal from noise. It’s not every single bit of intelligence regarding an attack comes into fruition. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. This is an extremely difficult signal detection problem, one with lives at stake.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -51 year ago

      Also they did have radar signatures of the attack incoming but radar tech was new and they didn’t trust it.

      • eric
        link
        41 year ago

        Please tell me you’re being facetious, because radar has been in use for more than 80 years.

          • eric
            link
            71 year ago

            I’m confused. When did this conversation divert to Pearl Harbor?

            • @bitwaba
              link
              31 year ago

              I think they responded to the wrong person. There’s a pearl harbor tangent happening above this.

        • @SaiPenguin
          link
          11 year ago

          I believe that radar should be read as radar system. That is to say it was a new radar system that had not been fully learned yet not that radar as a concept was new.

          • eric
            link
            11 year ago

            Well by that logic, we should be really suspicious of tech like the wheel or the plow.

            • @nrezcm
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              Which is why I have never used a plow before and never plan to.

              • eric
                link
                51 year ago

                Good. And I hope you don’t eat any food that contains ingredients that come from fields, or else you’re buying into big plow whether you like it or not.

              • eric
                link
                11 year ago

                deleted by creator