• @erranto
    link
    English
    291 year ago

    They have freedom of the press, but no freedom of speech they way it is guaranteed through the US constitution. in fact they have laws against hate speech and antisemitism.

    • @phoneymouse
      link
      English
      431 year ago

      Interesting, it would seem one can support a Palestinian state and oppose retaliation against innocent Palestinian civilians for the actions of an extremist group without being engaged in hate speech or antisemitism, however much the west really struggles with this concept.

      • @erranto
        link
        English
        251 year ago

        They know which side they stand on and they want all their citizens to align to it.

        • @phoneymouse
          link
          English
          151 year ago

          If that’s their justification then did they forget what democracy is about? It’s quite literally the opposite of having the government determine the people’s stance.

          • roguetrick
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            They’re democratic, just not particularly pluralistic. Everybody’s gotta be culturally French, very tyranny of the majority types.

      • Knedliky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Because it’s a stick to beat Muslim citizens with. It’s what all conservative French governments have been doing for the last 15 years, more or less openly depending on Le Pen’s (father or daughter) polling numbers. Darmanin is about as anti-Muslim pro-police-state as they come.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        “Freedom of speech” as it’s known in the US is slightly misnamed. It’s more accurately “freedom from government regulation of speech”, and the EU doesn’t really have the same protections.

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator