ghostarchive

Describing it as part of an “all-out offensive” to promote the French language in Quebec and “halt the decline in Montreal,” a Legault government task force will seek to increase tuition fees for foreign or out-of-province students attending English-language universities in Quebec.

“We’re fed up with managing a decline, of protecting the language, of slowing the erosion of the language, these are defensive terms. It’s time to regain ground,” Quebec French-language minister Jean-François Roberge said in an interview with La Presse. “If we want to change the linguistic profile of Montreal, to stop the decline in Montreal, we must focus on the question of rebalancing university networks.”

Roberge said that while 80 per cent of Quebec students attend French-language universities, only half of the 32,000 foreign or out-of-province students who study here do so as well.

“There are a lot of people who come to Quebec, who attend an English-language university and who very often express themselves in the English language on a daily basis.”

The task force also intends to table legislation that would oblige online giants such as Spotify and Netflix to make Quebec-produced content “more visible.”

Roberge’s announcement comes a little over a week after the Coalition Avenir Québec suffered a stinging defeat at the hands of the Parti Québécois in a byelection in the Quebec City riding of Jean-Talon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How do you imagine that the government is not a participant in the market – all while recognizing that they have control over prices?

    Fake argument confirmed.

    • ramOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      They have control over prices. That control isn’t “supply and demand”. It’s just price regulation.

      Also why did you immediately take me in bad faith? Just declaring “your argument’s fake” as you continue to seemingly refuse to grasp what the words “supply and demand” mean. You can be supportive of the law, that’s fine. But falsely claiming that it’s a response to the supply being less than what’s demanded when there’s literally no indication of that, and only the indication that Legault wants to protect the French language, does you no favours.

      • @Nouveau_Burnswick
        link
        11 year ago

        They have control over prices.

        Not really. The universities set the prices; the government pitches in the Québec and Canadian student discounts.

        Aka, if program X costs $27k, it’s the same price for everyone. University Y gets $27k regardless of who the student is.

        If the student is Quebecois.e then they pay $2880 and the province pays $24,120.

        If the student is Canadian (or French or Belgian) they pay $9,000 and the province pays $18,000.

        If the student is foreign, they pay $27,000 and the government pays nothing.

        If that program becomes $37k. The province still pays $24,120, $18,000 or $0. The students pay $12,880, $19,000, or $37,000.

        The only price controls the government has is what discount they offer to QC and CAN students. The universities are private and set their own tuition costs.

        • ramOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Ah that makes sense. I appreciate the clarification.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That control isn’t “supply and demand”. It’s just price regulation.

        Did you not even read your own comment? Like you suggested, supply and demand is a reaction to (although more accurately, observance of) the state of the market. What is all this nonsense? Do you not understand that regulation helps shape the market?

        Also why did you immediately take me in bad faith?

        Because there is no reasonable explanation for how you gave a fairly decent description of supply and demand, but then go off to crazy town as if you don’t even know what you said immediately after other than you looking for a ridiculous fight.

        But falsely claiming that it’s a response to the supply being less than what’s demanded when there’s literally no indication of that

        Claimed what now? I said it was to keep interest in anglo schools in check. That is not the same as “supply being less than what is demanded”, whatever that is supposed to mean.

        I’m afraid I don’t get this fake argument you are having. At least it is hilarious. I’ll give you that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re honestly tiresome. I’m blocking you and your weird-ass rhetoric.

            Okay, and? Is there some reason you want us to know this?

            but you honestly need to learn what the words “supply and demand” mean.

            Your definition was fine. Is there some reason you don’t like it anymore?