“Yes, I know. I know who’s the Thing and who’s not in the very end,” he said during an interview with ComicBook.com. But if you were hoping for any elaboration, then keep on hoping. “Nope,” Carpenter added when probed for more information. “Cannot tell you. Sorry,”

It was pretty much the same answer he gave SYFY WIRE last summer: “I know, but I’m not telling you … I just feel like it’s a secret that must be kept. The gods came down and swore me to secrecy.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    The chances that English is the creature’s native language is just about zero.

    All indications pointed the thing arriving extraterrestrially, but even if it was from an earlier terran civilization, I don’t see how modern English would be its native language.

    The perfect copy thing is an interesting point, but I don’t think is borne out by the movie since every character who’s opened up in one way or another has alien physiology under the skin, regardless of exposure or assimilation time.

    I think even if the alien were able to perfectly recreate a specific human brain, that doesn’t necessarily mean it could act on the whole of that information instantaneously or comprehensively, but I can’t recall if the movie bore this out either, other than circumstantially.

    Like having a perfect dictionary and encyclopedia right in front of you with every question you could ever ask, but you’d still have to flip to the pages to figure out what was the most likely behavior and motivation, even if you’re flipping through those pages mentally.

    I do see people mentioned a perfect recreation more than once, is this because it appears to perfectly copy the cells under the slide? Does some character say it’s a perfect copy? The doc says “given enough time a copy would be perfect”, right?

    Because a lot of theories talk about perfect copies egardless of the imperfect copies the movie shows us with larger organsms even though the thing apparently as enough time to recreate any large being perfectly with such a rapid rate of cellular, assimilation and copying.

    This is really making me want to watch the movie again.

    • @Bytemeister
      link
      Ελληνικά
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think even if the alien were able to perfectly recreate a specific human brain, that doesn’t necessarily mean it could act on the whole of that information instantaneously or comprehensively, but I can’t recall if the movie bore this out either, other than circumstantially.

      Definitely rewatch, especially with winter and Halloween coming up. In case you don’t rewatch it, consider the scene with Bennings-Thing in the snow. The Thing hadn’t finished copying him yet, so there is some “setup” time. Bennings didn’t talk, he just kind of moan/howls at the men, it is unclear whether he hasn’t replicated vocal chords yet, or if the Thing hadn’t finished copying his mannerisms. It’s the only scene where you actually see the Thing in the process of copying it’s victim.

      Consider these factors. It has clothes on, so the assumption that the thing has to rip through your clothes is not correct. Edit: the previous scene shows Benning’s shirt and vest ripped up, but his pants and shoes are still intact. So it doesn’t have to rip all the clothes, but I’d guess that extra physical contact accelerates the process. It has his glasses on and wearing them correctly. So the Thing even copies imperfections and is aware that the glasses are need to correct for them. I thought this dude had glasses for some reason. It’s mouth just hangs open when it vocalizes, no lip or tongue coordination, but it still produces tone. To me, this indicates that it physically has the hardware to copy Bennings voice, but at this point, it has not completely copied his mind. To further explore this, It was able to move around, and open doors, which are typically complex and coordinated locomotions.

      When you re-watch, pay special attention to this scene. Maybe you’ll see something that I have forgotten.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I know exactly the scenes you’re talking about, but I interestingly(and instinctively) came to the opposite conclusion, that it had mostly copied his brain, but hadn’t yet copied the right hardware for speech to become possible, since all of the autopsied organisms we see are largely alien inside.

        I’m definitely going to rewatch it again, I have the DVD and I just took it out to make sure I still had it ready to go.

        So the things I’m going to look at are weather. The thing can duplicate a multicellular organism perfectly, what the indications for the efficacy of retaining memories following that duplication (whether it’s more like a reference book or like automatic perfect memory), and what else should I be looking for?

        Oh I’ll definitely be marking down the voids, basically anytime someone or something is not on screen and could have been infected.

        I wonder also if there’s any indication that the creatures don’t know each other. If they’re infected and they signal to each other or test each other to see if they’re infected are real.

        I’m definitely going to watch it again, soon, and this will be my most detailed watch ever where I’m actually taking notes. Taking notes. I’m even going to come up with questions beforehand. Written down so I don’t lose track while I get caught up in the movie.

        What else is worth looking into?

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hmm, a theory I’ve had for a while is that the thing isn’t making careful calculated plans. It’s actually kind of desperate, feral, and afraid of the people.

          I don’t think the Things are coordinated/working together, or are aware of other Things that they haven’t created. Consider that when Bennings gets attacked, Palmer is already a thing at that point. It didn’t need to do anything else to get off Antarctica.

          I think Things are greedy. It wasn’t enough to just get away, It was compelled to quietly assimilate all the life at the outpost. Only at the end, when it became clear that the people had the tools and knowledge to deal with it, did it try to just kill everyone and freeze again.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yeah, definitely think the thing is terrified and desperate and also that they’re separate beings.

            But I just found out that the 2011 movie and the 2002 video game are supposed to be canon, at least the 2002 video game. Everyone is claiming that John Carpenter explicitly stated it was canon, which would answer the childs question definitively, but I haven’t found that interview that everyone is talking about yet.

            I’m going to do more research before I rewatch the movie I think and try and figure out how Canon the other entries into the series are first.

            Great excuse to go read a bunch of essays and analyzes and watch interviews about a movie and lore I love

      • @Bytemeister
        link
        Ελληνικά
        11 year ago

        …since all of the autopsied organisms we see are largely alien inside.

        The only time you see the innards of a thing is when it has already revealed itself to be a thing, and they people have killed it, or it is the frozen one that was an incomplete transformation. It copies at a cellular level, and can change its structures at will. Palmer didn’t walk around with an alien set of jaws in his head and chest, just underneath his skin. If he had been “killed” and examined before being caught and transforming, his innards would appear to be completely human.