• @bowcollector
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    so that justifies the bombing of civillians?

      • @SkyezOpen
        link
        English
        211 year ago

        Both sides are terrorists, yes. Glad we could agree on this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 year ago

            I’ll answer that.

            No it is not justified.

            Can I understand why Hamas would want to do this, sure , because I have empathy by the bucket load and can understand that having your land taken from you over decades and nothing changes could leave them to believe they have no choice.

            Is it still wrong? It sure is.

            Does that give Israel the right to use white phosphorus on the most densely populated place on Earth? I think not. What do you think?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -14
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Thans for at least an answer.

              Oh, you asked me a question…

              So I haven’t checked the whole story on the Willy Pete. I can’t conceive of a reason to use it, frankly. The reason the US used it in Fallujah, Mosul, and Raqqa was to clear canopies sometimes put over the streets in that part of the world. I wouldn’t think it’s anymore terrifying than airplanes dropping JDAM and such. I’ll take a look.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                I don’t know why my comment is not showing, nor your reply (only shows as a reply in my inbox but not on the post). You didn’t answer my question?