• g0nz0li0
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Interesting. I’m curious why you aren’t familiar with the details of constitutional amendment I linked to. You’re clearly not basing your opinion on primary sources, so what secondary sources are you consuming?

    • @0ddysseus
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      What makes you think I’m unfamiliar with it? I know exactly what it says, regardless of whether I’m a shit debater

      • g0nz0li0
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe because you keep claiming information hasn’t been made available when a simple google search proves you wrong?

          • g0nz0li0
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            I have the receipts. Here’s false statements you made that I corrected using easily available resource you refuse to acknowledge.

            not fucking one has presented any argument as to what this body will actually do to change anything.

            And

            Nobody has any fucking clue what powers it might have, its a blank check. Show one fucking piece of evidence that there is any public plan for what this “advisory body” can and can’t do, or shut the fuck up.

            And

            There is literally no scope included - they’ll decide after

            And

            And all this done by a group of people or an individual chosen through unspecified means with unspecified credentials.

            All of these are defined and you have wrongly claimed otherwise. You’re a rube.