• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, the answer is basically “Because the city government decided they didn’t want pedestrians to die, and acted accordingly.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes it’s really that simple.

      When Oslo and Helsinki achieved the same thing, it didn’t start with people asking for visible crossings or bicycle lanes. It started with people voting in a government that promised to get rid of pedestrian deaths. The actual plans and design followed.

      People might dismiss and argue for or against specific solutions, but I think we can all agree that pedestrian deaths are bad, so it shouldn’t be difficult to get started, regardless of who is running the government.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        The problem I’ve experienced in the US is that the local governments will voice support for this goal, claim they are pursuing it, but then just not implement really easy and basic solutions because of their fear of backlash.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Yes, that’s not US specific though. Politicians everywhere will promise everybody what they ask for and do nothing about it. Stuff like this is very localised, so it is a good idea to pay attention or even get involved with local politics, even if it’s less exciting than the presidential election.

          • @Danksy
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            It is somewhat US specific since the US is more dependent on cars than a lot of European places for example. That makes it harder to make changes that impact car owners negatively.