Potentially this means that Fedora and CentOS stream do not get timely updates implemented in RHEL.

Canonical must be throwing a party, and I bet SUSE is not hating it either

  • ReCursing
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Am I missing something? Nothing there says anything about becoming closed source?

    • BarrierWithAshes
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Quoted from my other post: Well in order to access the CentOS stream repo you need to have a subscription. So really not closed source but rather “harder-to-view-the-source”.

      • Carl George
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Well in order to access the CentOS stream repo you need to have a subscription.

        That’s false. The sources are right here, open to the world and open for contribution. What was shut down was the automation to export RHEL source RPMs to the legacy location. The source RPM exports were pretty much useless for contributors and maintainers of RHEL and CentOS. However, they were critical for RHEL rebuilds, which is why people are upset.

      • ReCursing
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        That’s not closed sourced, it’s just not free (or libre). I mean it still seems like a bad move to me, a retrograde step, but it won’t hurt the business side of things I expect

        • BarrierWithAshes
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Well, thats youtube sensationalism for you. Rocky Linux has already said it shouldn’t affect them and if they’re good I doubt there will be much issue.