The article accuses Israel of potentially committing war crimes in its conflict with Hamas, focusing on a siege on Gaza, airstrikes harming civilians, and evacuation orders. It criticizes the U.S. for not condemning Israel’s actions and emphasizes the need for diplomatic solutions. The piece argues that Israel’s approach could backfire politically and suggests that there’s no military solution to the conflict. It calls for the U.S. to exercise influence to deter such actions, asserting it’s in the interests of both the U.S. and Israel to prevent further civilian casualties and maintain regional stability.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But your answers are still every single minded.

    That’s because Netenyahu is the only reason the conflict has went on for so long. This whole mess should’ve ended in the 90s with the Oslo accords, but Netenyahu decided to just not appear when his predecessor was assassinated. Like literally he threw away peace just like that. Then he did it again in 2008 and 2012, as I said earlier.

    Hamas has already proved its willingness to end the violence, and they’ve made three good faith efforts to do so (2008 and 2012 ceasefires, 2012/2013 unified Palestinian government). Israel hasn’t reciprocated any of these. If you’re gonna say “yes I can” then you need some sort of basis.

    • @avater
      link
      English
      -7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The next degenerate terror regime, supported by religious fanatics around them I would say. But like I said, letting him go would probably support a positive movement in this conflict.

      Also you really want to make peace with this: https://lemmy.world/post/6815277