Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they contend is unconstitutional.

The couple from Redmond, Washington, claim they had to pay the money because of their investment in an Indian company from which, as Charles Moore, 62, said in a sworn statement, they “have never received a distribution, dividend, or other payment.”

But significant parts of the story they have told to reach this point seem at odds with public records.

The Moores are the public face of a high court case backed by business and conservative political interests that could call into question other parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth. The case is set for arguments on Dec. 5.

  • @alvvayson
    link
    1351 year ago

    Luckily the SCOTUS justices have no ties to the wealthy and are such excellent, impartial arbiters of blind justice.

    I’m sure we all have full faith in them.

    /s

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      271 year ago

      My thoughts as well. I love the optimistic tone of the headline, but it isn’t happening.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Welcome to US jurisprudence, where the rules are made up and the points precedent standing facts of the case don’t matter!