• Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -29
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I support some common sense restrictions on abortion… I don’t think anyone should be able to just up and demand the death of what is arguably a human life without a good reason.

    This is not that, hell it couldn’t be anymore obvious that the GOP doesn’t care about life or the safety of the child, they just want as many rules on the books as possible to let them punish “Enemies of the party”

    • @sailingbythelee
      link
      141 year ago

      See, what you call “common sense” restrictions is just you sticking your nose in a woman’s reproductive business.

      Mind your own business. Leave a woman’s health care up to a woman and her doctor. That’s common sense.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 year ago

        I don’t care what spin you put on it pal. No one should be allowed to kill a human being on a whim.

        Now if there’s something medically wrong with the fetus or the pregnancy is too taxing to be safely brought to term, that’s different.

        But the fact that you’re being upvoted and I’m being downvoted shows that the wackos from Reddit have finally discovered Lemmy

        • @I_LOVE_VEKOMA_SLC
          link
          31 year ago

          No, it shows that most people are reasonable and understand that a woman who decides for whatever reason that she isn’t ready for the commitment of parenthood, that is her business.

        • @sailingbythelee
          link
          21 year ago

          Wacko spin, eh? Thank you for so clearly identifying yourself as a reproductive authoritarian for all the women on Lemmy. If you think many women get an abortion “on a whim,” then you have bought into the right-wing propaganda.

          BTW, saying that the decision to abort should be made between a woman and her doctor means that medical ethics becomes the guiding framework, as opposed to criminal law. The state has no business criminalizing reproductive health.

          Canada has the best abortion law, which is to say it has no law on abortion. And yet, Canadian doctors are somehow not killing babies at 36 weeks “on a whim.” Hmmm, what could possibly explain that?

          Gee-wiz, Cletus, maybe we don’t have to criminalize abortion in order to get “common sense” behavior.

    • @Duamerthrax
      link
      41 year ago

      Welcome to the consequences of your actions.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Actually I vote Democrat exclusively because I’m aware that the GOP are domestic terrorists acting on behalf of Russian Homophobes, nice try.

        See while I think just letting ANYONE get an abortion is morally wrong and that the procedure should only be done in extreme cases, like rape, ectopic pregnancy, incest, major deformity, and the like, etc…

        I also realize Republicans are the opposite extreme in that they want NO ABORTIONS AT ALL and aren’t big on the concept of gender equality.

        So I vote Democrat despite the Abortion issue, as I realize neither party has a satisfactory answer to it, but the Democrat Answer causes less problems.

        It’s called “Don’t let Perfect be the enemy of Good”

        • sapient [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Do you think people (in particular, yourself) should be forced by state violence to donate their organs to someone who needs it to survive? Especially when the forced donation process involves significant risk to your own life and health (though i do not think that aspect particularly important for my own reasoning, personally .).

          Because advocating for “”“reasonable”“” restrictions on abortion is advocating for forcing someone to act as, essentially, a breeding pod, forced to donate their body and organs.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -51 year ago

            I think Organ Donation should be an Opt Out rather than an Opt In.

            Also Organ Donation isn’t done till after the person is dead, so your argument makes no sense.

            Anyway, that aside, if you are in a position to save another person or prevent their death, and either don’t or even just expedite what was already going to happen… You’re a killer in my eyes.

                • @SuddenlyBlowGreen
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you haven’t donated any, you’re trying to evade the question.

                  Anyway, that aside, if you are in a position to save another person or prevent their death, and either don’t or even just expedite what was already going to happen… You’re a killer in my eyes

                  That means, by your own logic, you’re a killer.

            • sapient [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you think a corpse should have more morphological autonomy than a living person?

              People can also organ donate while alive lol ;p

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        No I just am one of the people who don’t think it’s Misogynistic to have a problem with literal murder.