Israel's communications minister said on Sunday he was seeking a possible closure of Al Jazeera's local bureau, and accused the Qatari news station of pro-Hamas incitement and of exposing Israeli soldiers to potential attack from Gaza.

JERUSALEM, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Israel’s communications minister said on Sunday he was seeking a possible closure of Al Jazeera’s local bureau, and accused the Qatari news station of pro-Hamas incitement and of exposing Israeli soldiers to potential attack from Gaza.

The proposal to shut down Al Jazeera had been vetted by Israeli security officials and was being vetted by legal experts, Shloma Karhi said, adding that he would bring it to the cabinet later in the day.

Al Jazeera and the government in Doha had no immediate comment.

“This is a station that incites, this is a station that films troops in assembly areas (outside Gaza) … that incites against the citizens of Israel - a propaganda mouthpiece,” Karhi told Israel’s Army Radio.

“It is unconscionable that Hamas spokespeople’s message goes through this station,” he said, adding: “I hope we will finish with this today.” It was not clear if the latter statement referred to a cabinet discussion or implementation of a closure.

  • dumdum666
    -9•1 year ago

    Al Jazeera is like the most neutral of Neutral News Stations.

    lol, you are definitely a funny guy or you are hiding your sarcasm very well.

    „Since Al Jazeera’s founding in 1996, its Islamist skew grew stronger and damaged Qatar’s political relations with its neighboring states of Saudi Arabia and Egypt.[45] According to Hugh Miles writing for the BBC, “Al-Jazeera network remains the standard bearer for the Islamist position.”[43]“

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_controversies_and_criticism

    • @Alteon
      7•1 year ago

      Thank you dumdum for your quick wiki position. Care to entertain us with any other Google searches, you fantastic sleuth?

      Al Jazeera has a fantastic track record over decades of newscasting. If the only issue you have with them is shit from almost 2 decades ago, then my argument still stands.

      • Hyperreality
        5•1 year ago

        I suspect you made your mind up a long time ago, but for those reading the English version of Al-Jazeera appears to be relatively objective. The Arabic version is another matter.

        The wikipedia article on Al-Jazeera has a litany of incidences, some as recent as a few years ago.

        Obviously the internet is full of people who are either rabidly pro-Israel or pro-Palestine. Given that the truth is invariably the first casualty of war, it’s important to be critical and not fall into cherry picking or cognitive dissonance.

      • @DoomBot5English
        0•1 year ago

        Thanks for providing your own sources that refute his /s

        Also, take a look at their Arabic news, it’s definitely not the same as the English version.