“Microsoft’s actions following… acquisition of ZeniMax speak louder than… words.”

  • HarkMahlberg
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Not that Sony is worthy of any defending on our parts, but they have a recent track record of releasing their console exclusives to the PC a short while after. Of those two big conglomerates, Sony seems to be the more dedicated of the two to preserving multiplatform releases.

    • Ech
      link
      201 year ago

      I mean, on that front, MS has been releasing pretty much every "exclusive* on PC for some time. Starfield itself is coming to PC. I think it’s kinda weird that we label PCs under the “MS Console” umbrella and shame them for it, but Sony gets praised for it.

      • irinotecan
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I suppose the argument is that MS still makes money on Windows sales, whereas Sony only makes money on the game itself, for PC ports of games.

        • asteroidrainfallOP
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Sony isn’t just a gaming company though. They sell all kinds of home electronics and cameras. They also have their entire film and music divisions, not to mention their banking any insurance subsidiaries. Nintendo is the only platform holder that is just a gaming company.

    • loobkoob
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      The PC release is usually around two years after the PlayStation release, I believe, so it’s quite a while. Microsoft also releases all their games on PC on day one, and has done for several years at this point, so I’m not sure I’d agree that Sony is more dedicated to preserving multiplatform than Microsoft.

      • 13zero
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Microsoft also owns Windows, so it’s debatable whether a game for PC and Xbox can truly be considered multiplatform.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Starfield is currently available for pre-order on Steam with a release date of Sep 6. It’s coming to PC as well, without requiring an Xbox storefront or Game Pass, which does make it by all definitions multiplatform. I think the specific complaint at hand here is that it’s not coming to PS5, which seems kind of odd to me. Like, it’s cool if it also comes to Playstation, but we know Starfield isn’t coming to the Switch, for example. So why is it such a huge deal that it doesn’t come to PS5? Developers can’t be expected to support every platform on every game. I was mad as hell when Persona 5 wasn’t on switch (they eventually released Royal on switch but this was several years later), why wasn’t that a problem with the FTC? Should I be mad that Skyrim wasn’t ported to my 3DS?

      Personally I’m not really a fan of Call Of Duty so I wouldn’t be bothered if it did just fall off the face of the earth, but I understand people are concerned about Microsoft pulling a bait and switch and making the next COD Xbox only in order to drive console sales. So why, then, is this article talking about Starfield? Also if they were going to pull that they wouldn’t be bringing it to PC either because that just ruins your whole captive audience plan, and most or all of their recent AAA stuff that I know of have been multiplatform console/PC releases.

      I just don’t get it, I guess, is my point. Someone please explain to me what is going on here?

      • nathris
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Morrowind only released on Xbox + PC, Oblivion released on PS3 a year late and was a shitty port, Fallout 3 was a mess.

        Bethesda treating PlayStation as an afterthought predates their Microsoft acquisition by nearly two decades.

      • Tubeless5812
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Coloured by my experience as a PS4/PS5 owner, it’s frustrating because no-one ever expected Starfield to run on Switch… But a PS5 is very similar to an Xbox and would run it without an issue.

        A lot of people only have room/budget for one “main” device. Sony’s reputation for exclusive story rich games made that an easy choice.

        The fact that Bethesda games were available on PlayStation and Xbox in the past makes it feels more like something being taken from us rather than something that was never available to begin with. Even though Starfield is a new IP.

        I’ll power through it on my Steam Deck if it runs because I want to play it, but I’m going to remain bitter for some time.

      • Ech
        link
        21 year ago

        The jist of it would be that, while gaming exclusives have kinda just done their own thing for a while now, MS has invited the scrutiny of government agencies with such a big acquisition. That’s why they are getting the brunt of criticism ATM.

        It’ll be interesting to see if that scrutiny spreads to the other big devs as well during all this.

    • Entropywins
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I have gamepass for pc with lots of Xbox exclusive games… I have 5 Sony exclusives…