To be clear, this detail is not part of the constitutional amendment – and it is entirely normal for constitutions to leave this type of detail to be worked out in future by the parliament.
That statement is completely false.
There is not a single constitutional vote that has not outlined in full the changes to the constitution.
It’s extremely common for law to be established in 2 seperate ways, an act that defines what it’s for and who it effects and regulations that establish the how.
I think that’s what the article is saying; we are being polled on the concept of the voice, the actual wording of the specific law will be nailed down in parliament once they have approval to do it.
That statement is completely false.
There is not a single constitutional vote that has not outlined in full the changes to the constitution.
It’s extremely common for law to be established in 2 seperate ways, an act that defines what it’s for and who it effects and regulations that establish the how.
I think that’s what the article is saying; we are being polled on the concept of the voice, the actual wording of the specific law will be nailed down in parliament once they have approval to do it.
In an area that I happen to know a lot about, Gun laws in South Australia, there is the Firearms Act 2015 and the corresponding Firearms Regulations 2017