Facelikeapotato to [email protected] • 1 year agoHello!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1681arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1670arrow-down1imageHello!lemmy.mlFacelikeapotato to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoI believe you’re thinking of Dunbar’s Number, but it’s 150 rather than 300. Which does fit better with your original claim.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoYo that’s the one. Quick skew on wikipedia and I wonder how reliable it is though, given the confidence intervals and broad scope (apes?).
I believe you’re thinking of Dunbar’s Number, but it’s 150 rather than 300. Which does fit better with your original claim.
Yo that’s the one. Quick skew on wikipedia and I wonder how reliable it is though, given the confidence intervals and broad scope (apes?).