• @NocturnalMorning
    link
    221 year ago

    Read the article. I think you’re misunderstanding the exploit.

    • @TheDarkKnight
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Yeah this is one is on Cisco in general, still wondering why you’d have the web interface enabled anyways…just asking for problems right there.

      • Shadow
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If a fresh deployment isn’t secure out of the box, that’s definitely on cisco. There’s a lot of people out there who just plug in some hardware and then use the GUI to configure it. Just because it’s best practice to turn it off, doesn’t mean everyone is skilled enough to do so.

        We did have one compromised router from this at work, a fresh deploy that someone did a while ago and then the project got put on hold before it was actually configured. Was just sitting there with a public IP not doing much, but sure enough it was owned when I looked.

        One interesting thing is that the machine had HTTP enabled, but we had locked down SSH already. In the config you could see the attacker tried to enable SSH but couldn’t get it working (subnet inverted, lol cisco).

        • @TheDarkKnight
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Yeah it is on Cisco, not questioning that.

          Good catch getting it early, teach the young guys to kill those web portals…nothing but trouble. But I hear ya, sometimes CLI can be a pain.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        On a home network, I like having the web UI enabled for local access out of convenience, and I like buying higher end networking equipment. I don’t enable it for external access though, that’s just asking for trouble.

        It makes absolutely no sense in an enterprise environment, but there are a non-trivial number of non-enterprise customers of enterprise equipment.