• PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Countries are responsible for their actions. That’s how that works.

    Okay, so far, we’re in agreement.

    You don’t get to rape and murder your way through a continent, continue to benefit from your genocide but escape any responsibility because lol that was the Netherlands but we’re the Netherlands, not our problem.

    How far back does your conception of collective and ancestral guilt go, here? Genuine question.

    • Hegar
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Better genuine question: how much in reparations do you think the dutch government is responsible for?

      Just the $value of the goods and labour they stole through killing and violence? Extra to account for the wealth that could’ve been created by everything the dutch stole? Should they have to pay damages for the sheer brutality - the cutting off hands, the concentration camps, etc?

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Better genuine question: how much in reparations do you think the dutch government is responsible for?

        How could I answer that without knowing how far back their guilt is supposed to go?

        You answer my question, and I’ll have the tools to answer your’s.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          I’m not the person you’re replying to, but maybe as far back as we have receipts?

          In this case, there’s no mystery about who did what to whom and what they took. The Dutch and English kept very good records. In fact, the whole colonial project was very well accounted for.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I’m not the person you’re replying to, but maybe as far back as we have receipts?

            Is there any limit to this principle?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              Apparently, otherwise we would have begun the work of dismantling Western imperialism.

              Do you think there should be a limit?

              I personally think we should work to redress the wrongs we can, and in this case, the West could be doing a lot more to fix their crimes and being a lot less uppity about it.

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Apparently, otherwise we would have begun the work of dismantling Western imperialism.

                Do you think there should be a limit?

                Seemingly controversially, I don’t believe in ancestral guilt. As a mixed-race individual, I’m not half-oppressor and half-oppressed. Reparations should be to the extent of bringing others in-line with an equal and whole share of the polity - or the international community, as the case may be.

                As such, I would not regard there as being a set number for reparations - however many trillions it takes, it is the responsibility of those who have the necessary resources to assist those who lack the same access to resources. This is not a matter of debts to be ‘repaid’, it is a matter of recognizing the equal worth and humanity of others, regardless of nation. It is not a matter of guilt when the grandchildren of the grandchildren of the people who did these crimes are, themselves, long dead. These problems arose from division - they must end in unity and brotherhood.

                Obviously, there are also more recent crimes to be answered for - these are a debt in a much more real sense, and it necessary for governments to both acknowledge wrongdoing and make compensation to survivors or immediate family under civil law. Though obviously nothing can undo a crime once committed, that is the process that is generally agreed upon.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  I don’t really know what ancestral guilt is or what it has to do with anything people are asking for. It sounds very… Christian? Not that that’s a bad thing, it’s just not really the paradigm.

                  People from former colonies don’t necessarily want anyone to feel guilty, they just want to get paid back. Like you’ve said, everyone who was part of the original colonial thrust has died. Now it’s just a matter of paying it back + interest and a fine, and we’re on the way to being even Steve.

                  Sure, there’ll be some bad feelings, but that’s because the wound is still open.

                  • PugJesus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    31 year ago

                    I don’t really know what ancestral guilt is or what it has to do with anything people are asking for. It sounds very… Christian? Not that that’s a bad thing, it’s just not really the paradigm.

                    People from former colonies don’t necessarily want anyone to feel guilty, they just want to get paid back. Like you’ve said, everyone who was part of the original colonial thrust has died. Now it’s just a matter of paying it back + interest and a fine, and we’re on the way to being even Steve.

                    This is directly contradictory to my reading, I think this is what this whole dialogue hinges on.

                    My argument is that holding the people of modern countries responsible for the actions of their ancestors, by imposing a debt (and ‘interest and a fine’), that is ancestral guilt, and it is a fundamentally absurd concept.

          • @afraid_of_zombies
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Wait so guilt is only inherited if it is documented well?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I don’t think anyone seriously thinks guilt can be inherited… “Ancestral guilt” is a totally stupid concept, and framing colonial reparations that way is arguing in bad faith.

              I thought it would be funny to point out we literally have the receipts of colonialism, but that turned out to be arguing with pigeons.

              • @afraid_of_zombies
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I am glad the nicer version of the argument you have created for yourself matches up with the argument that you wish they had made.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Is that what I’m doing, what Pug is doing or what you are doing? (downvote if it’s you so I can know)

    • @RedAggroBest
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      Ancestral guilty goes back exactly as far as you can trace your ancestory. Lucky for us, that’s literally all royalty is.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        So if you don’t trace your ancestry at all, you have no guilt? Ignorance is innocence?

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I am thinking it is like god. You have to believe in it first in which case evidence doesn’t matter.