• @AllonzeeLV
    link
    44
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rose: My wealth makes me feel so trapped in a life I don’t want!

    Meanwhile, in steerage:

    • @money_loo
      link
      151 year ago

      Well, yeah. She was still a woman in an oppressively ordered patriarchy. Things have gotten a lot better since then.

      • @AllonzeeLV
        link
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        True.

        That said, on that specific night, women were lucky the patriarchy was still in place, as ladies first chivalry, based on the idea that women were objects/property to be cared for rather than individuals who could/should fend for themselves, still applied and well over twice as many women were given seats on lifeboats as men, which would be seen as really patronizing today.

        Everything has a cost, even equality.

        • ivanafterall
          link
          fedilink
          21
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As a man, I would have fought tooth and nail for a seat, but not out of selfishness.

          “PLEASE UNDERSTAND I’M DOING THIS FOR THE CAUSE OF WOMEN’S EQUALITY!!!”

        • @money_loo
          link
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For sure.

          It’s just once they got back home they still weren’t allowed to vote, grow professional careers, get equal access to higher education, own their own property while with a man because of coverture laws, be allowed to play in athletic sports or form leagues, hold any real position of political power, get a divorce easily to escape abusive relationships, allowed to be legally raped by their spouses as much as he wanted while having zero reproductive rights, etc.

          Just some give and take for that one day for some unlucky dudes, as you put it.

          • funkajunk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Those dudes weren’t just “unlucky”, they fucking died. Stop focusing on genetalia and look at humanity.

            • @money_loo
              link
              31 year ago

              …it was a tongue-in-cheek reply to the dismissive retort of the person I was responding to…the tone of which was meant to convey the ridiculousness of the statement, which they heavily edited to be far less sexist, to their credit.

              Also how would you like me to not recognize the disparity imparted by their “genitals” in a comment discussing how the people with openings for genitals were allowed special treatment at this time, and less so at later times. It’s literally the entire context.