Because what could possibly go wrong.

  • @smokin_shinobi
    link
    11 year ago

    The difference is Toyota doesn’t have a contract with African Warlords to buy fleets of Hilux’s.

    You see how there is a difference in these two things?

    • @metallic_substance
      link
      11 year ago

      No, I’m sorry, I don’t understand. Can you explain it another way?

      • @smokin_shinobi
        link
        21 year ago

        By having a contract in place where they are supplying the platforms that are used to be weaponized they are part of the production line for them. By knowingly doing this they shouldn’t get a pass with a sly wink and playing dumb.

        In your analogy Toyota can’t even really stop it. It’s a mass marketed civilian vehicle that is probably stolen and shoddily retrofitted. That’s not the same thing as Toyota handing a cargo ship of trucks over to warlords and saying, “You behave now.” knowing full well they are gonna mount .50s to the crossbar. That’s what is happening with Boston Dynamics still selling these.