Josh Paul, who said he has worked in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs for more than 11 years, said in his LinkedIn post that he resigned “due to a policy disagreement concerning our continued lethal assistance to Israel.”

“Let me be clear,” Paul wrote. “Hamas’ attack on Israel was not just a monstrosity; it was a monstrosity of monstrosities. I also believe that potential escalations by Iran-linked groups such as Hezbollah, or by Iran itself, would be a further cynical exploitation of the existing tragedy. But I believe to the core of my soul that the response Israel is taking, and with it the American support both for that response, and for the status quo of the occupation, will only lead to more and deeper suffering for both the Israeli and the Palestinian people – and is not in the long term American interest.”

“This Administration’s response – and much of Congress’ as well – is an impulsive reaction built on confirmation bias, political convenience, intellectual bankruptcy, and bureaucratic inertia,” Paul adds. “That is to say, it is immensely disappointing, and entirely unsurprising. Decades of the same approach have shown that security for peace leads to neither security, nor to peace. The fact is, blind support for one side is destructive in the long term to the interests of the people on both sides.”

  • @FilthyShrooms
    link
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I get that, but on the other hand who’s gonna replace him, someone more complacent? I’d almost rather the good person stay in a role where they can still do their good work.

    It’s the same issue where good police resign to make a statement, and now we’re left with all the bad ones

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      41 year ago

      I never bought into that wheels within wheels thinking. If you are job requires you to go against your moral judgement it is virtuous to find another job when you can.

      • @PRUSSIA_x86
        link
        11 year ago

        Moral victories are often pyrric in nature.