Grayox to [email protected] • 1 year agoOh hi therelemmy.mlimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1777arrow-down123
arrow-up1754arrow-down1imageOh hi therelemmy.mlGrayox to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-square@Mightylink9•1 year agodamn i just googled the legality and it seems you’re right. i thought the watermarked versions would be fine to use since it’s advertising the site… i guess i hope for “fair use”
minus-squareChe Bananalinkfedilink4•1 year agoI would argue that adding your own edit to a stock image would be considered a “parody” of the original, therefore legal to use.
damn i just googled the legality and it seems you’re right. i thought the watermarked versions would be fine to use since it’s advertising the site… i guess i hope for “fair use”
I would argue that adding your own edit to a stock image would be considered a “parody” of the original, therefore legal to use.
The parody argument might actually hold up.
Oof