• @awnery
    link
    English
    18
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      What was the context that the original commenter was responding to?

      Were they responding to studies where children and young people brought up in communities with a sense of self-identity have better outcomes? Religion could be a stand-in for community involvement.

      Responding to somebody’s comment in a vacuum, is disingenuous, it misses the context, and we could be missing the entire point. We don’t have enough data.

      And most importantly, this method of rhetoric does not convert people to your position.

      • @awnery
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I wasn’t angling for any religious position. I just think it’s unfair to take somebody’s comment out of context, slap a zinger on it, and then make a social media post about how you got’em.

          At best it’s lazy, at worst it’s misleading. it encourages sophistry.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            As a kid, I had many legitimate questions about religion (my mother was very christian), and all of them got smothered with a simple “you’re too young, you wouldn’t understand / it’s too complex / you’re missing context”. Turns out, she was simply wrong about a shitload, and didn’t want to admit it.