@TheOneWithTheHair to NewsEnglish • 1 year agoExecutive order bans gender-neutral language in Arkansas government documentsfayettevilleflyer.commessage-square138arrow-up1252arrow-down114
arrow-up1238arrow-down1external-linkExecutive order bans gender-neutral language in Arkansas government documentsfayettevilleflyer.com@TheOneWithTheHair to NewsEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square138
minus-squarediprount_tomatolink-2•1 year agoFirst, that’s not the Bible. Second, “we” is not “gender-neutral”, it’s just the standard 1st person plural
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year ago “we is not gender neutral” huh. TIL. what gender is it?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoLook, I know it’s sophistry, but so is the EO in the OP. But the fact of the matter is I you it we they me you us them this that these those such mine yours ours theirs who whom whomever whomsoever what whatever which whichever whose myself yourself self itself ourselves yourselves themselves each other one another all another anybody anyone anything both each either everything everybody everyone few many most neither nobody none no-one nothing several are all gender-neutral. Some of them can’t logically refer to gender, true, but that doesn’t make them start being gendered either. EDIT: ANNNND many of them do refer to an individual (I, me, you…)
First, that’s not the Bible. Second, “we” is not “gender-neutral”, it’s just the standard 1st person plural
huh. TIL. what gender is it?
Not one to refer to an individual, that’s for sure
Look, I know it’s sophistry, but so is the EO in the OP. But the fact of the matter is
are all gender-neutral. Some of them can’t logically refer to gender, true, but that doesn’t make them start being gendered either.
EDIT: ANNNND many of them do refer to an individual (I, me, you…)