This article contains descriptions of violence which some readers may find distressing.

The Israeli military held a screening for journalists on Monday of raw footage recovered from Hamas body cameras, in an effort to remind the world of the brutality of the attack on Israel two weeks ago.

The bodycam footage, cut together with clips from CCTV, dashboard cameras and the mobile phones of both Hamas gunmen and victims, showed in stark detail the sheer horror visited on a music festival and family neighbourhoods in southern Israel.

The Israeli military also released documents which they said were recovered from dead Hamas members, containing detailed operational planning and instructions for attacking the neighbourhoods and taking hostages.

The 43 minutes of footage screened in Tel Aviv on Monday was distilled from hundreds of hours of footage collected since the attack, the Israeli military said. It contained clips of Hamas gunmen cheering with apparent joy as they shot civilians on the road, and later stalking the pathways of kibbutzim and killing parents and children in their homes.

  • @paintbucketholder
    link
    English
    251 year ago

    I know you’re citing the United Nations as an authority, and providing a link is definitely welcome, but the site you’re linking literally says

    The number of people killed in Gaza has reached 5,087 according to latest reports from de facto authorities there

    thereby acknowledging that even the UN is merely repeating the numbers that Hamas is giving them.

    Could we maybe agree that blindly accepting whatever Hamas is saying as truth is not the best policy?

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      If the number is good enough for the U.N., it’s good enough for me. I’m in no position to “Um, aCKtUaLly…” the United Nations. ;)

      If they felt it was wrong or biased they wouldn’t cite it.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They themselves imply the number is likely to be biased (the defacto authority is hardly going to be impartial), but I agree, it isn’t your job to second guess the numbers being used by the UN.

    • ???
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • ???
      link
      English
      -11 year ago

      And the numbers were not biased in the end. Shock?

      • @paintbucketholder
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        You mean we should believe the numbers when the IDF is reporting them?

        • ???
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          No, I mean you were wrong 😊 let me know when you need more reading comprehension help

          • @paintbucketholder
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Because the IDF reported those numbers, and if the IDF reports those numbers, that means you were right?

            • ???
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              No, because the numbers were always right, because the UN and Gazan medical health centers and hospitals are reliable and have always been.

              • @paintbucketholder
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                The numbers were reported by Hamas. The UN merely used those numbers.

                Tell me why we should put blind faith into anything published by Hamas?

                • ???
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Because the numbers have been vetted and counted by the UN before the war many times. Because Gaza ha(d) a good enough medical standard and was trusted by medical organizations all over the world. The only people not believing the Gazan ministry is YOU, Israel, and the US. Whst a coincidence that no one else had any reason to doubt this number… Only genocide deniers do.

    • @TokenBoomer
      link
      English
      -21 year ago

      We can only interpret the information we’re given. To dismiss it is naive.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          English
          -51 year ago

          I’m sure the UN 🇺🇳 will take your comment into consideration.