• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Sighhhhh

          it is so tiresome being lied to when the evidence is a short scroll above

          it really does stink of being obstinately against change for no reason other than it being change.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As I said, I can’t fix your confirmation bias.

            I wasn’t pointing to a conspiracy, merely the fact that the criticism voiced so far doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

            Edit:

            I just realised you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

            Those are two different topics.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

              So, just being against progress. Like I said.

              you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

              Lol no.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                against progress

                Who? Artists, generally or those upset that AI/LLMs have been taught from their work? Not what I’m implying at all, as already highlighted extensively.

                People criticising AI/LLM art as ‘not art/not creative’? Yes.

                If you’re not conflating my argument, then you are either being really fucking stupid or deliberately trolling. In either case, I’m done wasting my time on you.