• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -321 year ago

    These two are different. The officer was attacked by the dog. That’s why he shot the dog.

    The deer they appear to be claiming because it was domestic.

    I get the domestic debate but I don’t agree with it. I’m not sure that’s the real reason but that is a standard policy to kill domesticated wild animals.

    It’s to prevent diseases from being spread.

    I’m not sure how much of a risk it is. I’d prefer they just let the animals live.

    • @Wrench
      link
      English
      291 year ago

      If you have to put down an animal, you just shoot it in the head or heart quickly and mercifully.

      This guy (allegedly, but appears to be recorded) tortured the animal first before killing it.

      This is a sick psyco killer with authority. He should not be on leave, he should be forever separated from the population before he starts wearing human skins.

      • chingadera
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        We all wear human skins

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 year ago

        I never defended what this guy did. As I said I didn’t see a need to kill the deer.

        • @Wrench
          link
          English
          141 year ago

          It’s strange to need to spell this out.

          The issue isn’t whether or not the deer needed to be killed. That’s a different argument that was rendered irrelevant, by the way this psycho killed it.

          I.E. this sick fuck, who also had a badge and can conceivably commit similar acts of depravity to humans, tortured and killed an animal in a brutal way.

          Whether the deer “needed” to be culled is irrelevant after such a heinous act.

          It’d be like nitpicking that subway security was too lax to catch a guy from jumping over the bars, after that person went on a shooting spree immediately afterwards. The turnstile jumping is completely irrelevant at that point.